Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 |
101. Eve Down Under Bombshell: No Sov overhaul until at least Winter 2014 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
La Nariz wrote: So you don't understand power creep? That only buffing things leads to a sort of inflation. Its not that nullsec is restricted its more that it is handicapped. Picture a swimming event, highsec is given steroids and flippers whi...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.12.03 00:46:00
|
102. Eve Down Under Bombshell: No Sov overhaul until at least Winter 2014 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
La Nariz wrote: Go ahead and don the tinfoil hat, its pretty much the only defense against nerfing highsec. When I talked to you and some others to buff null sec all I got was a vague answer about power creep, while you recognized that null s...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.12.03 00:26:00
|
103. Eve Down Under Bombshell: No Sov overhaul until at least Winter 2014 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
La Nariz wrote: So you are for power creep then, ~buff null don't nerf high~. EVE lore should have no place in game balance and instead should be crafted around the game design. For example if we apply ~EVE lore should make sense~ then there sh...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.12.02 18:33:00
|
104. Eve Down Under Bombshell: No Sov overhaul until at least Winter 2014 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
La Nariz wrote: Except that wouldn't fubar highsec, it would be a nerf to NPCs which are currently better than player made constructions in nullsec. Nerfing highsec does not translate to harming newbees either. Of course it would harm newbie...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.12.02 18:03:00
|
105. Eve Down Under Bombshell: No Sov overhaul until at least Winter 2014 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
La Nariz wrote: The easiest way to apply a quick fix to nullsec would be nerfing highsec. Remove station slots from NPC corp members, reduce the amount of highsec slots to the same amount available to unupgraded outposts, and only allow station...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.12.02 17:17:00
|
106. Eve Down Under Bombshell: No Sov overhaul until at least Winter 2014 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Stahlregen wrote: Pretty much, yeah. The only thing missing is that your summary understates massively how painfully convoluted and pointlessly intricated the whole process of taking, maintaining and ceding sov is. A summary always understat...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.12.02 15:45:00
|
107. Eve Down Under Bombshell: No Sov overhaul until at least Winter 2014 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scatim Helicon wrote: Most of the space is worthless, much of the good space derives its value from passive activity (moon mining), taking space is a a one dimensional hitpoint grind in the timezone of your opponent's choosing, over and over an...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.12.02 14:40:00
|
108. Serenity sever, another "Rubicon" for EVE itself? sth u and ccp may ne... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dextrome Thorphan wrote: It's not up to CCP... it's up to China's laws, which I don't see changing any time soon. As a near pun, it is up to CCP, but not the CCP we think of. CCP also stand for Chinese Communist Party, the ruling power in China.
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.12.02 13:57:00
|
109. Eve Down Under Bombshell: No Sov overhaul until at least Winter 2014 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Signal11th wrote: Haven't got a clue, 0.0 seems to be the same to me that it was years ago, person with the biggest stick usually wins. Timers are crappy because it gives the big boys a day or so to get the big fleet formed up just in case some...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.12.02 12:48:00
|
110. Eve Down Under Bombshell: No Sov overhaul until at least Winter 2014 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
My take on this topic is that of an outsider, so even if I can throw guesses I'm pretty sure I don't have a clear vision of what problems plague NSec. Could someone try to explain them in a clear way so people like me can better understand these p...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.12.02 11:51:00
|
111. New Goon Pocos - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote: Realistically, you need a large group of people spread across all time zones to reliably hold highsec POCOs. In nullsec you can get away with a small group of high skill players in dreads and carriers to grind and re...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.11.27 22:04:00
|
112. Probably the WORST event I've wasted my time on in my 10 years of eve - in Live Events Discussion [original thread]
epicurus ataraxia wrote: I hope that rather than unsubscribing now that most will wait for CCPs reaction. If satisfactory, then we can put it behind us and play on. I believe that if however their reaction should prove the accusations or fail t...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.11.10 18:08:00
|
113. Probably the WORST event I've wasted my time on in my 10 years of eve - in Live Events Discussion [original thread]
epicurus ataraxia wrote: While not good, that would still allow players to continue playing,whilst if the original accusation proved to be true, that would be impossible. Some players would go on playing as if nothing has happened, but some o...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.11.10 17:02:00
|
114. Probably the WORST event I've wasted my time on in my 10 years of eve - in Live Events Discussion [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Deunan Tenephais wrote: Are really some people not seeing a problem in CCP, the company managing the game, not being seen as trustworthy by customers ? Looks like all my comments about CCP being run by people clos...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.11.10 16:47:00
|
115. Why does null-sec want to conquer high-sec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
KuroVolt wrote: Deunan Tenephais wrote: Many posts. Serious question: If you think that most Null sec alliances and Low sec alliances are basically people with similar mindsets. Does that mean for example that CVA and Goonswarm are in yo...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.11.10 16:20:00
|
116. Why does null-sec want to conquer high-sec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jarod Garamonde wrote: I'm against the people, yes. Not the good ones that quietly go about their lives, not trying to impose their playstyle onto everyone. But the truly terrible ones that demand everything be handed to them, unleash a constan...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.11.10 15:44:00
|
117. Why does null-sec want to conquer high-sec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jarod Garamonde wrote: Deunan Tenephais wrote: Jarod Garamonde wrote: You both OBVIOUSLY don't get it. Like, at all. You have this ridiculous "Saturday morning cartoon villain" vision of what motives people have for thinking a certain wa...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.11.10 15:14:00
|
118. Why does null-sec want to conquer high-sec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jarod Garamonde wrote: You both OBVIOUSLY don't get it. Like, at all. You have this ridiculous "Saturday morning cartoon villain" vision of what motives people have for thinking a certain way. And your post do not explain anything about "the...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.11.10 14:53:00
|
119. Hi Sec: Your Future Vision - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scatim Helicon wrote: The future vision of highsec? A sea of autopiloting and pseudobotting characters performing acts of tedium on an infinite loop, interrupted only by indignant shrieking should the terrifying bogeymen of encouraging players ...
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.11.10 13:31:00
|
120. Probably the WORST event I've wasted my time on in my 10 years of eve - in Live Events Discussion [original thread]
Are really some people not seeing a problem in CCP, the company managing the game, not being seen as trustworthy by customers ?
- by Deunan Tenephais - at 2013.11.10 12:53:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |